Tim,
I tried the very thing you asking about. I modified my Curtis cab mounts so that I could leave them attached to the frame and still mount the loader brackets. I probably have pictures of the mods to the loader brackets. The other part I discovered I needed to do was to remove the inner "ear" off of each loader bracket socket...the part that accepts the loader masts. I thought that would do it, however, the clearance was so tight between the loader brackets and the outside of the cab, I gave it up because I would have either dented or scratched the cab with the loader bracket sockets. I settled for being able to leave the Curtis cab mounts permanently attached to the frame when switching from winter to summer configuration.
I asked Curtis if they had designed the cab to be used with the loader and they said no. The main reason was the horizontal cross member between the loader masts would prevent the cab being installed at the same time. I had decided I could add a stand-off to the front of each loader mast to allow enough clearance for the cab but when the loader frame socket clearance issue surfaced I didn't pursue any further.
Having said all this, as I recall from reading on this site awhile back, there seem to be two different sets of loader brackets. If I recall correctly, I think the only difference between the two was that the newer version offered more clearance between the loader bracket and the rear tires (more clearance for bar tires and/or turfs with chains). If the newer version also provided 1/4" more clearance between the inside edge of loader socket and the fender pan foot rests, then it might be doable to have the loader and cab co-exist....in my case at least.
Hope this helps....let me know if you want pics of the modified Curtis cab mounts and I'll see if I can dig them up.
Tim
I tried the very thing you asking about. I modified my Curtis cab mounts so that I could leave them attached to the frame and still mount the loader brackets. I probably have pictures of the mods to the loader brackets. The other part I discovered I needed to do was to remove the inner "ear" off of each loader bracket socket...the part that accepts the loader masts. I thought that would do it, however, the clearance was so tight between the loader brackets and the outside of the cab, I gave it up because I would have either dented or scratched the cab with the loader bracket sockets. I settled for being able to leave the Curtis cab mounts permanently attached to the frame when switching from winter to summer configuration.
I asked Curtis if they had designed the cab to be used with the loader and they said no. The main reason was the horizontal cross member between the loader masts would prevent the cab being installed at the same time. I had decided I could add a stand-off to the front of each loader mast to allow enough clearance for the cab but when the loader frame socket clearance issue surfaced I didn't pursue any further.
Having said all this, as I recall from reading on this site awhile back, there seem to be two different sets of loader brackets. If I recall correctly, I think the only difference between the two was that the newer version offered more clearance between the loader bracket and the rear tires (more clearance for bar tires and/or turfs with chains). If the newer version also provided 1/4" more clearance between the inside edge of loader socket and the fender pan foot rests, then it might be doable to have the loader and cab co-exist....in my case at least.
Hope this helps....let me know if you want pics of the modified Curtis cab mounts and I'll see if I can dig them up.
Tim